I mean, REALLY?!?! Come on, people …
From the American Family Association (Hat tip: Right Wing Watch)
No more Muslims in the US Military
Some choice quotes …
It it is time, I suggest, to stop the practice of allowing Muslims to serve in the U.S. military. The reason is simple: the more devout a Muslim is, the more of a threat he is to national security. Devout Muslims, who accept the teachings of the Prophet as divinely inspired, believe it is their duty to kill infidels. Yesterday’s massacre is living proof. And yesterday’s incident is not the first fragging incident involving a Muslim taking out his fellow U.S. soldiers.
{…}
This is not Islamophobia, it is Islamo-realism.
{…}
The barbarians are no longer at the gate. They’re inside the fort, and it’s time for the insanity to stop.
First of all, I am resisting an urge to say “Pot, meet kettle” after reading that last statement. May the Lord forgive me for even thinking that.
Secondly, if this were isolated, in and of itself, I would not be too incensed. But when you find a major news organization strongly implying the same thing, even going so far as to suggest special screenings for Muslim members of our armed forces, and either implicitly or explicity saying that we have to watch out for the “scary Muslims” in our military, then this is too much.
Much more was said in the aftermath of this tragedy, but you’ll have to search the intertubes for yourself.
What happened at Fort Hood is a tragedy of senseless violence. I grieve for the fallen and those who remain on this earth. I pray they will all be reunited in the Resurrection.
To use that tragedy to point fingers at an entire segment of the population and imply that they’re loyalties to the nation are suspect is simply beyond the pale, even for these folks.
Frank Rich, NYTimes, gets it
31 08 2008There has been a lot of talk about the selection of Sarah Palin as running mate for Republican nominee John McCain. Frank Rich, Op-Ed columnist for the NYTimes, gets what this is all about.
The main reason McCain knuckled under to the religious right by picking Palin is that he actually believes there is a large army of embittered Hillary loyalists who will vote for a hard-line conservative simply because she’s a woman. That’s what happens when you listen to the TV news echo chamber. Not only is the whole premise ludicrous, but it is every bit as sexist as the crude joke McCain notoriously told about Janet Reno, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton.
It is obvious this faithful lady and mother of five is being used by the Republican party to appeal to the religious right. This choice has been called “irresponsible” by one particular prominent lady, whose husband I had the privilege of working for during the first six months of my tenure at the investment bank I work for. I just hope Governor Palin is going into this campaign eyes-wide-open and realizing that her gender and her faith are being used to further the secular political ends of a womanizer.
Comments : 4 Comments »
Tags: commentary, Election 08, evangelical watch
Categories : Uncategorized